Wrong experiments are expensive.
Know what to test next.
Sirmint ranks the highest-value hypotheses for your materials and energy R&D team — before lab budget is spent. Evidence-backed. Private. Built for founders, CTOs and research leaders.
The bottleneck is not intelligence. It is choosing what to test.
Literature is too large for any team to fully connect. Low-evidence paths still consume months and budget. Competitors who choose better tests move faster.
Lost on weak experiment directions
Burned before evidence is ranked
Roadmap delay and missed edge
A decision layer before the lab
Not another reading tool. A ranked view of what is worth testing next — under your control.
Connect the evidence
Literature and optional private data, structured around your research goal.
Rank what to test
Hypotheses ordered by evidence strength, novelty and practical risk.
Decide with clarity
Your team approves the shortlist. Lab time goes to higher-value work.
Built for IP-sensitive R&D
Private deployment options available. We do not train public models on your proprietary research. Your IP stays under your control.
Decision makers who own experiment spend
Founders & CEOs
Protect runway. Reduce wasted cycles. Move milestones with clearer technical bets.
CTOs & Chief Scientists
Raise the quality of what reaches the lab. Keep data private and under governance.
Heads of R&D
Give teams a ranked test board instead of open-ended literature overload.
Materials & energy companies
Batteries, advanced materials, chemistry and deep-tech hardware R&D.
Start Discovery
A focused 4–8 week engagement on one real research question. Ranked hypotheses. Clear next tests. Then decide whether to expand.
Start Discovery